CHITUO · Automated Straight-Rebar Smart Line | Procurement · Cutting · Scheduling Optimization
Test How Much Steel Your Project Saves
Manual cutting averages 94.5% material utilization; Chituo's triple optimization reaches up to 99.6%. Switch between real project cases below or paste your own Excel bar list.
Enter Your Project Cut List
Triple-Optimization Result (Φ25mm)
Output: 220 pcs (4.154 t)Step 1 · Lowest-Cost Mill Stock Comparison (9m / 12m / Custom)
| Procurement Option | Stock Bars | Total Weight | Utilization | Scrap Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.0m Standard Stock Only | 200 bars | 6.93 t | 59.9% | 0% |
| 12.0m Standard Stock Only | 100 bars | 4.62 t | 89.9% | 0.4% |
| Custom 10.54m Stock + 12m MixBest Choice | 100 bars | 4.17 t | 99.6% | 0.4% |
Step 2 · Cutting Patterns & 50-Pocket Automatic Sorting
All bars ≥30cm auto-sorted via gapless chain bedScan the WeChat QR code to chat with us anytime
Whether you want to run your full Excel bar list, request a full-line quote, or book a live trial cut in Xiamen, simply scan the WeChat QR code.
Scan on WeChatShop-Floor Comparison · Why Manual Cutting Loses Steel & Fails Audits
Processing 1,000 Tons of Straight Rebar: Manual Crew vs. Chituo Robot Line
Based on a typical 1,000-ton finished rebar delivery target, compare a 5–6 worker manual crew against the Chituo Automated Straight-Rebar Smart Line across five shop-floor stages:
Planners order only standard 9m or 12m bundles by habit. For 5.27m main bars, every 12m bar leaves a 1.46m tail offcut before cutting even begins.
Chituo's software evaluates 9m, 12m, and custom mill lengths (such as 10.54m for 2×5.27m) alongside mixed nesting—eliminating predictable offcuts before ordering.
Two workers climb onto 2-ton bundles with bolt cutters to snip taut steel straps, then pry tangled bars apart with crowbars and count them by hand.
One click dispatches the line: vision cameras guide the robotic arm to shear and extract straps, chains comb the bundle flat, and electromagnets lift the exact bar count verified by laser.
When short bar sizes multiply, manually measuring and shifting stop gauges takes too much time—leaving 1.4m remnants piled up in corners as wasted offcuts.
Backed by automated transfer for any bar ≥30cm, the software nests long main bars and short tie bars on the same stock bar with ±1mm servo length-stop accuracy.
Conventional spaced rollers drop bars shorter than 1.5m into roller gaps, forcing two workers to bend over and pick short pieces by hand all day.
A gapless steel chain bed carries every bar from 30cm to 12m smoothly while the 50-pocket mobile rack shifts underneath to collect each batch automatically.
At month-end, handwritten logs rarely match the mixed piles on the floor. Utilization hovers around 94.5%, leaving ~58 tons of unexplained waste per 1,000 tons.
With zero manual intervention, every bundle opened, cut executed, and pocket filled is logged automatically—reaching 99.6% utilization and instant book-to-physical alignment.
📊 Delivering 1,000 Tons of Finished Rebar: Bottom-Line Comparison
| Metric | Manual Crew Mode | Chituo Automated Smart Line | Net Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Material Utilization | 94.5% | 99.6% | +5.1 percentage points |
| Raw Steel Required for 1,000t Output | ~1,058.2 t (~58.2 t waste) | ~1,004.0 t (~4.0 t crop scrap) | Saves ~54.2 tons of raw steel per 1,000t |
| Crew Size per Shift | 5–6 workers (unstrapping, prying, cutting, picking) | 1 crane operator; 0 operators during cutting | Reduces labor by >80% |
| Hourly Throughput | 1.5 – 2.5 t/h | 6 – 8 t/h (15–20 min per 2t bundle) | 3×–4× higher throughput |
| Month-End Inventory Audit | 1–2 days downtime for manual counting | Zero manual entry; real-time reconciliation | 100% Reconciled Inventory |